design-systems

Patterns, components, and tokens. Decisions in main pane; WIP in threads.

RG IF OB LH +8

Yesterday · Thursday, May 21

Renske Goh 3:42 PM

Pushed v0.6 of the token spec — renamed color.brand to color.accent across surface, ink, and semantic layers. Cleaner separation between role and brand.

🎯 4 🙌 2 +

Iben Faro 3:58 PM

Migration script ready when you are. Touches 218 files; nothing structural.

$ pnpm tokens:migrate --from 0.5 --to 0.6 --dry-run
✓ 218 files scanned · 412 rewrites planned · 0 conflicts

RG OB LH 7 replies · last from Lior, 4h ago

Today · Friday, May 22

Oren Bahir Admin 9:14 AM

Heads up @design-systems — I'm pinning the migration runbook so we don't lose it in the firehose. Includes rollback steps and the channel to escalate to (#ops-alerts) if a job hangs past 10 minutes.

migration-runbook-v0.6.md

14 KB · markdown · pinned by Oren

Going to run a smoke test on staging at 10. Will report back here.

Renske set the channel topic: "Patterns, components, and tokens. Decisions in main pane; WIP in threads."

New messages

Renske Goh 10:24 AM

@here — filed the proposed token names. The one to argue about, I think, is color.surface.2: should we keep the numeric ladder or move to semantic names like raised / sunken?

👍 3 🎯 1 +

IF OB 4 replies · last from Iben, 2 min

Oren Bahir Admin 10:28 AM ⚠ failed · retry

Pushing the patch now — call me if the runner doesn't pick it up by noon.

Leaning toward the semantic names — but only if we keep a small numeric alias for legacy. Iben, what does the migration cost look like on that?

⌘↩ to send · ⇧↩ for newline · /commands available